EDR/MDR and SOC, SIEM Integration: Building Complete Enterprise Security Architecture

EDR, MDR, SOC, SIEM... these security terms often appear together, but what's the relationship between them? How do you integrate these solutions to establish complete enterprise security protection architecture?

This article will explain the positioning of each solution and provide specific integration architecture designs to help you understand how to combine these solutions into an effective security system.

Security Architecture Foundation Concepts

Before discussing integration, let's understand each solution's role.

What is SOC?

SOC stands for Security Operations Center.

SOC Core Functions:

1. Monitoring: 24/7 monitoring of enterprise security status
2. Detection: Identifying suspicious activities and potential threats
3. Analysis: Investigating alerts, determining whether they're real threats
4. Response: Executing threat remediation and recovery
5. Reporting: Producing security reports and improvement recommendations

SOC Components:

SOC typically includes three elements:

• Personnel: Security analyst team (L1, L2, L3)
• Processes: Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), incident handling procedures
• Technology: Various security tools (SIEM, EDR, firewalls, etc.)

Simply put, SOC is a team and operating mechanism, not a piece of software.

What is SIEM?

SIEM stands for Security Information and Event Management.

SIEM Core Functions:

1. Log Collection: Collecting logs from various sources (firewalls, servers, applications, etc.)
2. Normalization: Unifying processing of different log formats
3. Correlation Analysis: Finding relationships between events from different sources
4. Alert Generation: Generating alerts based on rules
5. Compliance Reporting: Producing reports meeting regulatory requirements

Common SIEM Products:

Product	Features
Splunk	Powerful, expensive, industry standard
Microsoft Sentinel	Cloud-native, Azure integrated
IBM QRadar	Enterprise-grade, strong analytics
Elastic SIEM	Open source based, lower cost
LogRhythm	Integrated SOAR functionality

Differences Between SIEM and EDR:

Aspect	SIEM	EDR
Data Sources	Broad (various logs)	Narrow (endpoints)
Analysis Depth	Shallow (log level)	Deep (behavior level)
Detection Focus	Correlation analysis	Endpoint threats
Response Capability	Limited	Complete
Primary Value	Overall visibility	Endpoint protection

EDR/MDR Position in Security Architecture

After understanding SOC and SIEM, let's look at EDR/MDR positioning:

EDR Position: Tool

EDR is one of many tools SOC teams use, specifically responsible for endpoint detection and response. In security architecture, EDR is responsible for:

• Providing deep endpoint-level visibility
• Detecting endpoint threats traditional SIEM can't see
• Executing response actions on endpoints

MDR Position: Service

MDR is outsourced SOC functionality. When enterprises can't build their own SOC, MDR provides:

• Professional security monitoring team
• 24/7 monitoring and response service
• Usually includes EDR tools

Overall Relationship Diagram:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                      SOC                            │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │                Personnel                     │   │
│  │  Security Analysts / Threat Hunting / IR    │   │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │                Technology                    │   │
│  │  ┌─────┐  ┌─────┐  ┌─────┐  ┌─────┐        │   │
│  │  │SIEM │  │ EDR │  │Fire-│  │Other│        │   │
│  │  │     │  │     │  │wall │  │     │        │   │
│  │  └─────┘  └─────┘  └─────┘  └─────┘        │   │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │                Processes                     │   │
│  │  Incident Handling SOP / Escalation / Report│   │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

For EDR/MDR basics, see EDR vs MDR Complete Guide.

EDR and SOC Collaboration Models

What Does EDR Provide to SOC?

EDR is an important tool for SOC teams, providing these values:

1. Endpoint Visibility

Logs collected by SIEM typically only show "what happened," but EDR can see "how it happened":

SIEM Can See	EDR Can See
User login	Every program executed after login
File accessed	Which program accessed it, what it did
Network connection established	Which program initiated, what was transmitted
Program execution	Complete program behavior chain

2. Advanced Threat Detection

Many advanced attacks don't leave obvious traces in traditional logs:

• Fileless attacks (executing in memory)
• Living off the Land (using legitimate tools)
• Lateral movement (spreading within internal network)

EDR's behavior analysis can detect these threats.

3. Rapid Response Capability

When SOC discovers threats, EDR provides:

• Immediate isolation of infected endpoints
• Remote termination of malicious programs
• Forensic evidence collection
• Batch deployment of remediation actions

4. Attack Timeline

EDR provides complete attack timelines, helping SOC understand:

• Where did the attack start?
• What did the attacker do?
• How big is the impact scope?
• How to prevent recurrence?

How Does SOC Utilize EDR?

A mature SOC uses EDR this way:

Daily Monitoring

EDR Alert Generated → L1 Analyst Initial Classification → Real Threats Escalate to L2 → Complex Events Escalate to L3

• L1 analysts handle initial EDR alert classification
• Filter false positives, confirm real threats
• Execute standard response actions

Threat Hunting

Threat Intelligence → Build Search Hypothesis → Search in EDR → Discover Potential Threats → Investigate & Confirm

• Use EDR's search functionality to proactively find threats
• Build search conditions based on latest threat intelligence
• Discover attackers hiding in the environment

Incident Investigation

Discover Anomaly → Use EDR to Reconstruct Event → Confirm Attack Scope → Execute Remediation → Produce Report

• Use EDR's timeline functionality to reconstruct attack process
• Confirm all affected endpoints
• Collect forensic evidence

Integration Architecture Diagram

Typical EDR and SOC integration architecture:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                      Endpoint Environment                    │
│  ┌─────┐  ┌─────┐  ┌─────┐  ┌─────┐  ┌─────┐             │
│  │PC-1 │  │PC-2 │  │PC-3 │  │Srv-1│  │Srv-2│  ...        │
│  │Agent│  │Agent│  │Agent│  │Agent│  │Agent│             │
│  └──┬──┘  └──┬──┘  └──┬──┘  └──┬──┘  └──┬──┘             │
└─────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼───────────────────┘
      │        │        │        │        │
      └────────┴────────┼────────┴────────┘
                        │
                        ▼
              ┌─────────────────┐
              │  EDR Cloud      │
              │  Platform       │
              │  · Data Collect │
              │  · Threat Analy │
              │  · Alert Gen    │
              └────────┬────────┘
                       │
         ┌─────────────┼─────────────┐
         │             │             │
         ▼             ▼             ▼
    ┌─────────┐  ┌─────────┐  ┌─────────┐
    │EDR      │  │  SIEM   │  │ SOAR   │
    │Console  │  │         │  │        │
    └────┬────┘  └────┬────┘  └────┬────┘
         │             │             │
         └─────────────┼─────────────┘
                       │
                       ▼
              ┌─────────────────┐
              │   SOC Team      │
              │Monitor·Analyze  │
              │    ·Respond     │
              └─────────────────┘

EDR and SIEM Integration Methods

Why Need EDR + SIEM?

EDR and SIEM each have advantages; integration allows them to complement each other:

Capability	SIEM Only	EDR Only	SIEM + EDR
Overall Visibility	✅	❌	✅
Endpoint Deep Visibility	❌	✅	✅
Advanced Threat Detection	⚠️ Limited	✅	✅
Compliance Reporting	✅	⚠️ Limited	✅
Automated Response	⚠️ Limited	✅ Endpoint	✅ Complete
Correlation Analysis	✅	⚠️ Limited	✅✅

Core Integration Values:

1. More Complete Correlation Analysis: Combining network, application, endpoint data
2. Reduced Missed Detections: EDR detects threats SIEM rules can't find
3. Enhanced Investigation Capability: SIEM provides big picture, EDR provides details
4. Automated Workflows: Trigger EDR response actions through SIEM/SOAR

Integration Technical Solutions

EDR and SIEM integration methods mainly include:

1. API Integration

EDR Alerts → EDR API → SIEM Collector → SIEM Platform

Advantages:

• Good real-time performance
• Complete data
• Bidirectional communication possible

Disadvantages:

• Requires integration development
• API may have rate limits

2. Syslog Forwarding

EDR Alerts → Syslog Output → SIEM Syslog Collector → SIEM Platform

Advantages:

• Standard protocol, good compatibility
• Simple configuration

Disadvantages:

• Data format needs parsing
• May lose some fields

3. File Export

EDR Alerts → File Export (JSON/CSV) → SIEM File Collector → SIEM Platform

Advantages:

• Simple implementation
• No complex integration needed

Disadvantages:

• Poor real-time performance
• Complex file management

4. Native Integration

Some EDR and SIEM products have native integration:

EDR	Natively Integrated SIEM
Microsoft Defender	Microsoft Sentinel
CrowdStrike	Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel
SentinelOne	Splunk, Elastic
Trend Micro	Splunk, their Vision One

Common Integration Combinations

Based on enterprise size and needs, common integration combinations include:

Small Enterprise (Limited Budget)

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint + Microsoft Sentinel

Advantages:

• Native integration, no additional development needed
• Cost-effective (may be included in M365 license)
• Single vendor support

Medium Enterprise (Balanced Needs)

SentinelOne/CrowdStrike + Splunk Cloud

Advantages:

• Top-tier EDR detection capability
• Splunk's powerful analytics and search
• Mature integration solution

Large Enterprise (Complete Requirements)

CrowdStrike + Splunk Enterprise + SOAR

Advantages:

• Optimized detection and analysis capability
• Complete automated response
• Highly customizable

Integration Considerations

When integrating EDR and SIEM, note:

1. Data Volume Management

EDR generates large amounts of data. If all sent to SIEM, it may:

• Increase SIEM license costs
• Impact SIEM performance
• Generate too much low-value data

Recommended Approach:

• Only send alerts, not raw telemetry data
• Use filtering rules to reduce data volume
• Only log details for important events

2. Alert Correlation

After EDR alerts are sent to SIEM, they need to be correlated with other data sources:

• Establish unified asset identification (hostname, IP, user)
• Design correlation rules
• Avoid duplicate alerts

3. Response Actions

Integration enables automated response:

• SIEM detects suspicious activity
• Triggers SOAR playbook
• Isolates endpoint via EDR API

Note: Automated response must be carefully designed to avoid false positives causing business disruption.

---

Need Help with Security Architecture Design?

Integrating EDR, SOC, and SIEM is complex architectural work. Poor design may waste budget or leave protection gaps.

Book Architecture Consultation—our consultants will:

• Evaluate your current security architecture
• Design the most suitable integration solution
• Provide implementation recommendations and cost estimates

Consultation is completely free—let professional consultants help you plan.

---

MDR and SOC/SIEM Relationship

MDR vs Self-Built SOC

When enterprises consider security monitoring capability, they face a choice: build SOC or outsource to MDR?

Conditions for Self-Built SOC

Enterprises suitable for self-built SOC typically have:

• Sufficient personnel (at least 8-10 for 24/7 coverage)
• Sufficient budget (personnel, tools, space)
• Long-term strategy to develop security capability
• High requirements for data control

Self-Built SOC Cost Estimate

Item	Annual Cost
Personnel (8 people)	$300,000-500,000
SIEM License	$50,000-150,000
EDR License	$30,000-120,000
Other Tools	$15,000-60,000
Space & Equipment	$15,000-30,000
Training & Certification	$10,000-20,000
Total	$420,000-880,000

MDR Cost

Same scale enterprise using MDR:

Item	Annual Cost
MDR Service Fee	$60,000-200,000
Internal Coordinator (part-time)	$0
Total	$60,000-200,000

Conclusion: For most enterprises, MDR has better cost-effectiveness.

How MDR Works with Existing SIEM

If an enterprise already has SIEM, they can still use MDR:

Scenario 1: MDR as Primary Monitoring

Endpoints → MDR Service → Alert Notification to Enterprise
          ↓
        SIEM ← Log Import (optional)

• MDR handles primary threat monitoring
• SIEM used for log preservation and compliance reporting
• Reduces SIEM alert handling burden

Scenario 2: SIEM Integrates MDR Alerts

Endpoints → MDR Service → Alerts → SIEM
                                    ↓
                             Internal Team Analysis

• MDR alerts sent to SIEM
• Internal team views unified in SIEM
• Leverage SIEM correlation analysis to enhance MDR alerts

Scenario 3: MDR Supplements SIEM Capability

SIEM ← Various Log Sources
  ↓
Internal Team Monitors SIEM
  ↓
Discover Endpoint-Related Events → Request MDR Deep Investigation

• SIEM handles overall monitoring
• MDR handles professional endpoint investigation
• Internal team coordinates both

Hybrid Model: MDR + Internal SOC

Many enterprises adopt hybrid models:

Model 1: Time-Based Division

Business Hours (9:00-18:00): Internal SOC monitoring
Non-Business Hours: MDR service takes over

Advantages:

• Reduces internal staffing needs (no night shift needed)
• Maintains control during business hours
• Costs less than full self-build

Model 2: Capability-Based Division

Internal SOC: General monitoring, compliance, reporting
MDR: Advanced threat hunting, complex event investigation

Advantages:

• Leverages MDR's professional capabilities
• Internal team focuses on familiar work
• Improves overall detection capability

Model 3: Growth Path

Initial: Fully rely on MDR
Mid-term: MDR + Small internal team (Co-managed)
Long-term: Self-built SOC (MDR exits or becomes backup)

Advantages:

• Gradually build capability as enterprise grows
• No need for large upfront investment
• Time to cultivate internal talent

How XDR Changes Integration Architecture

XDR Integration Advantages

XDR (Extended Detection and Response) changes traditional integration models:

Traditional Architecture: Multi-Tool Integration

EDR ─┬→ SIEM ─→ SOC
NDR ─┤
Email Security ─┤
Cloud Security ─┘

Problems:

• Multiple tools each generate alerts
• Need manual correlation in SIEM
• High integration complexity
• Severe alert fatigue

XDR Architecture: Native Integration

Endpoints ─┬
Network ─┼→ XDR Platform ─→ SOC
Email ─┤      ↓
Cloud ─┘   Auto Correlation

Advantages:

• Native data integration
• Automatic correlation analysis
• Unified console
• Reduced alert fatigue

XDR vs SIEM + EDR

What's different between XDR and traditional "SIEM + EDR" combination?

Aspect	SIEM + EDR	XDR
Integration Method	Manual integration needed	Native integration
Correlation Analysis	Custom rules needed	Built-in correlation engine
Alert Volume	High	Low (already integrated)
Investigation Efficiency	Need to switch tools	Single interface
Customization	Highly flexible	More limited
Maturity	Mature	Newer

Selection Recommendations:

• Choose SIEM + EDR: Need high customization, existing SIEM investment, need long-term log retention
• Choose XDR: Want simplified architecture, suffering from alert fatigue, want quick integration capability

XDR and SOC Collaboration

XDR changes how SOC works:

Traditional SOC Workflow

SIEM Alert → Analyst Interprets → Investigate (switch to EDR) → Confirm Threat → Respond
    ↑                         ↓
    └─── Correlation Analysis (manual) ←───┘

Problems:

• Analysts need to switch between multiple tools
• Manual correlation is time-consuming
• Easy to miss correlated events

XDR SOC Workflow

XDR Integrated Alert → Analyst Interprets → Investigate (same interface) → Confirm Threat → Respond
                    ↑
              Auto Correlation Completed

Improvements:

• Single interface completes all work
• Auto correlation saves time
• Investigation efficiency greatly improved

Security Architecture Design Recommendations

Small Enterprise Recommended Architecture

Suitable For: Under 100 people, no dedicated security personnel

Recommended Architecture: MDR

┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│     Your Enterprise Environment     │
│  ┌─────┐  ┌─────┐  ┌─────┐        │
│  │End- │  │End- │  │End- │  ...   │
│  │point│  │point│  │point│        │
│  └──┬──┘  └──┬──┘  └──┬──┘        │
└─────┼────────┼────────┼────────────┘
      │        │        │
      └────────┼────────┘
               │
               ▼
      ┌─────────────────┐
      │  MDR Provider   │
      │24/7 Monitor&Resp│
      └────────┬────────┘
               │
               ▼
      ┌─────────────────┐
      │  Your IT Staff  │
      │Receive Reports, │
      │   Coordinate    │
      └─────────────────┘

Budget Estimate: $40,000-100,000/year

Key Points:

• Use MDR service, no self-operation needed
• IT staff only needs to receive reports and execute recommendations
• Compliance reports provided by MDR

Medium Enterprise Recommended Architecture

Suitable For: 100-500 people, small IT/security team

Recommended Architecture: EDR + SIEM (Basic) + Co-managed MDR

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│           Your Enterprise Environment            │
│  Endpoints (EDR Agent), Servers, Network Devices │
└───────────────────────┬─────────────────────────┘
                        │
          ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐
          │                           │
          ▼                           ▼
    ┌───────────┐              ┌───────────┐
    │    EDR    │              │   SIEM    │
    │ Endpoint  │──Alerts To──→│Log Analysis│
    │ Detection │              │           │
    └─────┬─────┘              └─────┬─────┘
          │                           │
          ▼                           ▼
    ┌───────────────────────────────────────┐
    │         Internal Security Team         │
    │ Business Hours Monitoring, Handle     │
    │         General Incidents             │
    └───────────────────┬───────────────────┘
                        │
                        │ Non-Business Hours/Complex Events
                        ▼
    ┌───────────────────────────────────────┐
    │            MDR Service                 │
    │    Night/Weekend Monitoring,          │
    │         Expert Support                │
    └───────────────────────────────────────┘

Budget Estimate: $130,000-260,000/year

Key Points:

• EDR provides endpoint protection
• SIEM collects logs for compliance and overall visibility
• Co-managed MDR supplements non-business hours and professional capability

Large Enterprise Recommended Architecture

Suitable For: 500+ people, complete security team

Recommended Architecture: Self-Built SOC + XDR/EDR + SIEM + SOAR

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    Enterprise Environment                     │
│  Endpoints, Servers, Network, Cloud, Email, Applications     │
└──────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘
                               │
     ┌────────────┬────────────┼────────────┬────────────┐
     │            │            │            │            │
     ▼            ▼            ▼            ▼            ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│   EDR   │ │   NDR   │ │ Email   │ │ Cloud   │ │   IAM   │
│         │ │         │ │Security │ │Security │ │         │
└────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘
     │            │            │            │            │
     └────────────┴────────────┼────────────┴────────────┘
                               │
                               ▼
                    ┌─────────────────────┐
                    │    XDR Platform     │
                    │      or SIEM        │
                    │Correlation Analysis │
                    │       Center        │
                    └──────────┬──────────┘
                               │
                    ┌──────────┴──────────┐
                    │                     │
                    ▼                     ▼
            ┌─────────────┐       ┌─────────────┐
            │    SOAR     │       │   Threat    │
            │  Automated  │       │Intelligence │
            │  Response   │       │  Platform   │
            └──────┬──────┘       └─────────────┘
                   │
                   ▼
         ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
         │           Self-Built SOC             │
         │  ┌─────┐  ┌─────┐  ┌─────┐         │
         │  │ L1  │  │ L2  │  │ L3  │         │
         │  │Moni-│  │Inves│  │Expe-│         │
         │  │tor  │  │tiga-│  │rt   │         │
         │  │     │  │te   │  │     │         │
         │  └─────┘  └─────┘  └─────┘         │
         │         24/7 Shift                  │
         └─────────────────────────────────────┘

Budget Estimate: $500,000-1,000,000/year

Key Points:

• Self-built SOC provides complete control
• XDR or SIEM integrates various data sources
• SOAR enables automated response
• Threat intelligence enhances detection capability

Maturity-Oriented Evolution Path

Security architecture should evolve gradually with enterprise maturity:

Level 1: Basic Protection

Antivirus → Enterprise Antivirus → EDR

Goal: Establish endpoint basic protection

Level 2: Monitoring Capability

No Monitoring → MDR Service → Partial Self-Built SOC

Goal: Obtain continuous monitoring capability

Level 3: Integrated Analysis

Single-Point Tools → SIEM Integration → XDR Platform

Goal: Establish overall visibility and correlation analysis

Level 4: Automated Response

Manual Response → Script Automation → SOAR Platform

Goal: Accelerate response, reduce manual intervention

Level 5: Proactive Defense

Passive Defense → Threat Hunting → Proactive Intelligence

Goal: Transform from passive to proactive, predict threats

---

Want to Build Complete Security Protection Architecture?

Starting from scratch to build security architecture, or upgrading existing architecture, requires professional planning. Wrong direction may waste millions in budget.

Book Free Security Assessment—we can help:

• Evaluate your current security maturity
• Design appropriate evolution path
• Recommend optimal tool combinations
• Provide budget and timeline estimates

We'll respond within 24 hours, all consultation content completely confidential.

---

Further Reading

• For EDR, MDR, XDR comparison, see EDR vs MDR vs XDR Comparison
• Want to learn about NDR and XDR ecosystem? See NDR and XDR Security Ecosystem Guide
• Ready to implement? See Enterprise EDR/MDR Implementation Guide
• For EDR/MDR basics, see EDR vs MDR Complete Guide

Illustration: Security Tools Relationship Positioning Diagram

Scene Description: Three-layer concentric circle architecture diagram. Outermost circle labeled "SOC (Organization & Processes)" represented by dashed circle. Middle circle labeled "SIEM (Data Platform)" represented by solid circle. Innermost circle divided into four equal parts, labeled "EDR" "NDR" "Email Security" "Other Tools" respectively. Arrows connect between three layers, outer to middle labeled "Uses," middle to inner labeled "Integrates." Legend on right side explains what each circle layer represents.

Visual Focus:

• Main content clearly presented

Required Elements:

• Based on key elements in description

Chinese Text to Display: None

Color Tone: Professional, clear

Elements to Avoid: Abstract graphics, gears, glowing effects

Slug: security-tools-relationship-diagram

Illustration: EDR and SIEM Integration Architecture Diagram

Scene Description: Left-right split flowchart. Left side labeled "EDR Domain," contains three layers: top layer "Endpoint Devices" with three computer icons, middle layer "EDR Platform" with server icon, bottom layer "EDR Console" with screen icon. Right side labeled "SIEM Domain," same three layers: top layer "Various Log Sources" with multiple square icons, middle layer "SIEM Platform," bottom layer "SIEM Console." Bidirectional arrows connect the two middle layers, labeled "API Integration." At bottom, a rectangle spanning both sides labeled "SOC Team," with connections to both bottom layers.

Visual Focus:

• Main content clearly presented

Required Elements:

• Based on key elements in description

Chinese Text to Display: None

Color Tone: Professional, clear

Elements to Avoid: Abstract graphics, gears, glowing effects

Slug: edr-siem-integration-architecture

Illustration: Enterprise Security Architecture Maturity Staircase Diagram

Scene Description: Staircase diagram rising from lower left to upper right, with five stairs. Each stair shows one maturity level. First stair "Level 1 Basic Protection" with firewall icon, labeled "EDR." Second stair "Level 2 Monitoring Capability" with eye icon, labeled "MDR/SOC." Third stair "Level 3 Integrated Analysis" with connection icon, labeled "SIEM/XDR." Fourth stair "Level 4 Automated Response" with gear icon, labeled "SOAR." Fifth stair "Level 5 Proactive Defense" with radar icon, labeled "Threat Intelligence." Vertical arrow on right side of stairs labeled "Maturity Improvement."

Visual Focus:

• Main content clearly presented

Required Elements:

• Based on key elements in description

Chinese Text to Display: None

Color Tone: Professional, clear

Elements to Avoid: Abstract graphics, gears, glowing effects

Slug: security-architecture-maturity-levels

Illustration: Three Enterprise Size Security Architecture Comparison Diagram

Scene Description: Three boxes arranged horizontally, representing security architectures for small, medium, and large enterprises. Left box titled "Small Enterprise," content simply shows "MDR Service" as single element. Middle box titled "Medium Enterprise," content shows "EDR" "SIEM" "MDR" three elements arranged vertically with connecting lines between them. Right box titled "Large Enterprise," content shows complex architecture: "XDR/SIEM" in center, connected to "EDR" "NDR" "SOAR" "Threat Intel" "Self-Built SOC" five surrounding elements. Each box has corresponding annual budget range labeled below.

Visual Focus:

• Main content clearly presented

Required Elements:

• Based on key elements in description

Chinese Text to Display: None

Color Tone: Professional, clear

Elements to Avoid: Abstract graphics, gears, glowing effects

Slug: enterprise-security-architecture-comparison